Now they can track your car without a warrant as well if your cellphone is on you.
Just because you're paranoid...
Doesn't mean they're not out to get you.
1 posted on
05/05/2015 6:55:40 PM PDT by
Utilizer
To: Utilizer
“If you’re not doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about. You won’t mind if we have a look around right?” -Government
To: Utilizer
3 posted on
05/05/2015 6:58:35 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
To: Utilizer
Gee, what Constitution. We don’t need no stinking Constitution.
4 posted on
05/05/2015 6:58:52 PM PDT by
doc1019
(Blue lives matter)
To: Utilizer
5 posted on
05/05/2015 7:01:50 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Utilizer
its clear that cellphone users in todays society understand how companies collect data about calls —
Quartavious Davis didn’t.
6 posted on
05/05/2015 7:05:03 PM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
(an icon of resistance within the oppressed patriots, who represent resilience in the face of SSV)
To: Utilizer
It has nothing to do with location. It has everything to do with privacy in who you talk to on the phone.
8 posted on
05/05/2015 7:16:59 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Utilizer
You don’t own the cellphone tower, nor do you own the cellphone company location records. I don’t see the problem here.
L
11 posted on
05/05/2015 8:02:59 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Utilizer
In fact, Circuit Judge Frank M. Hull wrote for the majority, its clear that cellphone users in todays society understand how companies collect data about calls and that cell towers are a key part of that. So the announcement of implied corporate contracts is now the de facto legalization of the government abuse of them?
Sounds like a big win for Facebook users - what could possibly go wrong?
12 posted on
05/05/2015 8:05:45 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: Utilizer
This is modern judicial “conservatism”. It is just as bad as “libtardism”. At least the Libtards make a little effort at pretending there’s a 4th Amendment.
To: Utilizer
Ever heard of the Fourth Amendment?
14 posted on
05/05/2015 8:51:15 PM PDT by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson