Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Lottery Misprint means Woman Out of Luck
Palm Beach Post ^ | Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Posted on 05/31/2015 3:36:47 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Florida’s 1st District Court of Appeal Wednesday ruled that a woman is not entitled to collect a $500,000 prize because the scratch-off lottery ticket purchased by her husband included a misprint.

A three-judge panel upheld a ruling by Leon County Circuit Judge Terry Lewis against Anna Maria Curcio, whose late husband in 2007 purchased a $20 “Gold Rush” lottery ticket that the couple thought was a winner. A number on the ticket appeared to be the number one, which would have been a winning match. But Wednesday’s ruling said a caption under that number included the letters “TH” and a partial “N,” indicating that the number was 13 — and not a winning match.

stock lottery photo

The ruling said evidence showed that the confusion stemmed from a misprint “caused by an ink jet malfunction in the machine that printed the ticket.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Local News
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/31/2015 3:36:47 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Florida’s 1st District Court of Appeal Wednesday ruled that a woman is not entitled to collect a $500,000 prize because the scratch-off lottery ticket purchased by her husband included a misprint.

How long before this logic is applied to those holding US Currency?
2 posted on 05/31/2015 3:37:51 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It’s always the easy way out - “Oh, you’ve won? Oops, misprint on our part. Sorry”


3 posted on 05/31/2015 3:44:18 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Tough break but makes sense. The three was clearly meant to be there but the printer dropped it off.


4 posted on 05/31/2015 3:45:50 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Why anyone plays these stupid games is beyond me.

“Tax on stupid people” is right.

The house always wins. Who can’t understand that?


5 posted on 05/31/2015 3:46:26 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

“The house always wins. Who can’t understand that?”

The few lucky ones who won. :-)


6 posted on 05/31/2015 3:53:10 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
“The house always wins. Who can’t understand that?”
The stupid people who play the lottery. But I have seen people with a lot of money pool their play when the jackpot gos up to astronomical figures. Poor fools, they don't understand that the odds of winning are the same no matter the prize, they just feel they should play due to the high prize. I never play. In California, as probably in all states, it was instituted deceptively to “help the schools.” Well what happened? The schools are still short of money--and always will be-- but the public IS NEVER GIVEN AN ACCOUNTING OF WHERE THE LOTTERY MONEY GOES, WHAT IS LEFT AND WHERE THAT IS. The state can lie when it wants with immunity, but you cannot.
7 posted on 05/31/2015 4:02:07 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


We need your help to keep the lights on.
FR is funded solely by contributions made by
liberty loving people who enjoy and use it.

Every donation counts no matter how big or small.
If you can donate $5, $10, $20, $100 or more,
it would be greatly appreciated.


Let's Git-R-Done! Tomorrow is June!

8 posted on 05/31/2015 4:05:18 PM PDT by RedMDer (Keep Free Republic Alive with YOUR Donations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Sorry. Not buying it.

Blatant homophobia: every homosexual I know refers to a singular occurrence as oneth.

9 posted on 05/31/2015 4:40:42 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47 -- with leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Emphasis on FEW.


10 posted on 05/31/2015 4:52:01 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

I guess it already happened. I was watching The Homesman and one of the character’s money was not acceptable in another state because it came from a bank in a territory that printed its own money.


11 posted on 05/31/2015 4:54:09 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fungi
Since lottery "taxes" are voluntarily paid by those who wish to have a chance at winning a large amount, versus very low odds of doing so, that's fine by me.

The more taxes that are paid in that manner means that there can be fewer of the odious ones which are imposed on everybody.

Heck, they should create more lotteries and use them to raise all tax revenue, as far as I'm concerned.

Why not a Federal lottery? Seems like a creative way to raise revenue in a voluntary manner.

12 posted on 05/31/2015 5:06:55 PM PDT by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fungi
In California, as probably in all states, it was instituted deceptively to “help the schools.” Well what happened? The schools are still short of money—and always will be.

It is the same in Washington State. In inflation adjusted dollars it now costs taxpayers 3 times what it did in 1970 for a K through 12th grade education. Standardized achievement tests show that the average student performs exactly 0% better than they did in 1970. That however is because standardized achievement tests have been dumbed down.

http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/library/chart-graph/inflation-adjusted-cost-k-12-public-education-and-percent-change-achievement-17-year-olds-1970

13 posted on 05/31/2015 5:06:56 PM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I believe there was a case just a couple of years ago -- a woman was playing slots in a casino: coin goes in, arm goes down, wheels spin around -- BOOM! Lights start flashing! Siren start wailing! Big excitement! Her machine is going WILD! Yes! It's the big MILLION DOLLAR WINNER!

Casino guy walked over and said, "Looks like that machine is busted. Sorry. You didn't win nuthin'.

The House doesn't like to lose. And Sometimes "the house" is the government.

14 posted on 05/31/2015 5:41:25 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Claire Wolfe should check her watch. It's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sargon

I never mentioned the word “tax.”


15 posted on 05/31/2015 5:43:29 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

1NTH is 13?


16 posted on 05/31/2015 6:09:54 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Do they ever examine losing tickets to see if by misprint someone actually was supposed to win?


17 posted on 05/31/2015 6:10:39 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Funny how Hollywood's 'No Nukes' crowd has been silent during Obama's Iranian nuclear negotiations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

The Founding Fathers played a lottery to raise funds for the Continental Army.

Were they stupid?


18 posted on 05/31/2015 6:17:50 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The lottery has even worse odd that it appears, once you recognize that the few who do get lucky may be splitting the win with someone who is gaming the system.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2023514/Joan-R-Ginther-won-lottery-4-times-Stanford-University-statistics-PhD.html

“First, she won $5.4 million, then a decade later, she won $2million, then two years later $3million and in the summer of 2010, she hit a $10million jackpot.

“The odds of this has been calculated at one in eighteen septillion and luck like this could only come once every quadrillion years.

“Harper’s reporter Nathanial Rich recently wrote an article about Ms Ginther, which calls the the validity of her ‘luck’ into question.

“First, he points out, Ms Ginther is a former math professor with a PhD from Stanford University specialising in statistics.


19 posted on 05/31/2015 6:30:35 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson