Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/05/2015 10:15:49 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

The baker probably should have refused on the grounds that he wouldn’t engage in copyright infringement.


2 posted on 06/05/2015 10:17:53 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Respect to Patrick Stewart, at least he has common sense in this issue.


3 posted on 06/05/2015 10:19:47 AM PDT by Marko413
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

How’s he doing after Mel Gibson bit off his nose?


5 posted on 06/05/2015 10:20:25 AM PDT by dainbramaged (Get out of my country now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

“Make it so.”


6 posted on 06/05/2015 10:22:39 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Ian McKellen will not be happy.


7 posted on 06/05/2015 10:23:07 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
Stewart demonstrates a basic wisdom in his statement that "It was not because this was a gay couple they objected, it was not because they were going to be celebrating some kind of marriage, it was the actual words on the cake they objected to, they found them offensive." He recognized that discrimination, as applied legally, is about persons, not ideas, which is how I have argued businesses should operate here in America. People cannot refuse to sell cakes to white supremacists just because of who they are, but they could refuse to write something bigoted on a cake, and I think any court would defend that principle. Focus on the words and not on the people and you may stand a chance. Sadly, though, that did not hold true in N. Ireland, but I would like to think we have still not managed to fall as far as they have over there, at least not yet.
8 posted on 06/05/2015 10:25:30 AM PDT by cothrige ("An error which is not resisted is approved; a truth which is not defended is suppressed" Felix III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

A decision so wrong that even a gay rights activist can’t agree with it. Thing is, this is a natural progression of the gay mafia’s cause. Denying anything to someone who is gay, for any reason, is by result, a crime.


10 posted on 06/05/2015 10:26:08 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Whether or not you agree with Patrick Stewart on gay rights, I’ll give him credit for a certain consistency. He may be all for the gays, but he’s also for the right to say no to them and against their efforts to force their agenda on those who cannot in good conscience support it.

I can accept that, whether or not I completely agree.


14 posted on 06/05/2015 10:40:37 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

He doesn’t want to go where no man has gone before?......................


15 posted on 06/05/2015 10:44:42 AM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

17 posted on 06/05/2015 10:46:58 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

18 posted on 06/05/2015 10:49:48 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Finally a gay activist with some brains. Although pointing out the writing on the wall just before the wall falls on you is a tad late. Nevertheless, better late than never. All Stewart is saying is, “hey wait a minute, I think we need to hold on to at least the last shred of personal freedom under the law, I don’t like the way the Muslims are smiling these days...”


19 posted on 06/05/2015 10:55:16 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
The little boy was sitting on a park bench munching on one chocolate bar after another. After the 6th one a man on the bench across from him said, 'Son, you know eating all those chocolates isn't good for you. It will give you acne, rot your teeth, make you fat.'

The boy replied, 'My grandfather lived to be 107 years old.'

The man asked, 'Did your grandfather eat 6 chocolate bars at a time?'

The little boy answered, 'No, he minded his own damn business!'

20 posted on 06/05/2015 10:59:34 AM PDT by 11th Commandment ("THOSE WHO TIRE LOSE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Why is it so hard to understand that you have every right to discriminate against putting labor toward an EVENT you disagree with. You’re not discriminating against them as people - they’d otherwise make any other cake they want.

Why can’t the answer just be, “I’ll make YOU any cake for any reason except for a gay wedding?”. You’re not refusing service based on discrimination against a person because of who they are but what they’re asking you to labor toward.

When it comes to recognizing rights, people tend not to if it won’t impact them. If you’re not religious you are not sensitive to religious rights. If you’re not black you are not sensitive to black rights. etc. It can be difficult to see the injustice when it doesn’t impact you. Now we have the gay activists empowered and believing their rights trump religious rights to the point of trampling on them with impunity and not seeing the problem. They don’t care about religious rights, many probably don’t think there should be any at all.

This is compelled speech, coerced speech and forced servitude. The worst part is that they don’t even consider the backlash that will be coming as this can only have one conclusion. They think we should all just “get used to it”, regardless of whose rights are being violated.


21 posted on 06/05/2015 10:59:39 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

22 posted on 06/05/2015 11:06:46 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
"Transphobia"

Goody. A new word for the PC crowd. As usual, they don't get that "phobia" means fear. Those opposing GLBT types are not fearful, just repulsed.

Here's some new suggestions that can be applied to homophobia and/or transphobia:
Homorepulsed;
Homoresistent;
Homodisgusted;
Homoadverse;
Homotired-of-hearing-about-your-sex-preferences-everyday;

Feel free to add your own.

25 posted on 06/05/2015 11:11:42 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Can’t you make the cake and give whomever the icing to make whatever they want with it?


27 posted on 06/05/2015 11:17:31 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Patrick Stewart is right.. Thanks for defending the bakery...


30 posted on 06/05/2015 11:49:08 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Such new cakes, symbols of submission, are the new Auto de Fe. Convert or Die. Molon Labe, LGBT creeps.


33 posted on 06/05/2015 11:59:20 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

I didn't know Captain Picard had been promoted to 'rear admiral'...


35 posted on 06/05/2015 12:39:27 PM PDT by farming pharmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson