Posted on 06/14/2015 9:32:11 AM PDT by MadIsh32
Western journalists claim that the big lesson they learned from their key role in selling the Iraq War to the public is that its hideous, corrupt and often dangerous journalism to give anonymity to government officials to let them propagandize the public, then uncritically accept those anonymously voiced claims as Truth.
But theyve learned no such lesson. That tactic continues to be the staple of how major US and British media outlets report, especially in the national security area. And journalists who read such reports continue to treat self-serving decrees by unnamed, unseen officials laundered through their media as gospel, no matter how dubious are the claims or factually false is the reporting.
(Excerpt) Read more at firstlook.org ...
The Times is loyal to the “Lavatories” of David Cameron’s “Conservative Party” and would print any propaganda Cameron’s government gave them.
News collection agencies can edit out or suppress facts that may prove to be less than helpful to their continued “access” to more propaganda dumps?
I did not know that.
(Oh, fecal matter, do I HAVE to include the < /sarcasm > tag?)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.