Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp; DoodleDawg

Obviously, if there are two sides, there can be two motives. For Lincoln, it appears to have been about preserving the Union. For the secessionists, it appears to have been about preserving slavery.


67 posted on 08/11/2015 3:09:51 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Tau Food
Obviously, if there are two sides, there can be two motives. For Lincoln, it appears to have been about preserving the Union. For the secessionists, it appears to have been about preserving slavery.

Only one side had control as to whether or not there was going to be a war, and whether or not that war would continue. Therefore, only those motives matter. The motives of the defenders are irrelevant. They have no control over whether they are going to get attacked or not.

Lincoln was the puppeteer. He called the shots.

76 posted on 08/11/2015 4:05:48 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson