Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

Guess that is a more polite way of saying they are too ugly to fly.


3 posted on 09/14/2015 7:03:26 AM PDT by Reno89519 (American Lives Matter! US Citizen, Veteran, Conservative, Republican. I vote. Trump 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reno89519

Guess that is a more polite way of saying they are too ugly to fly.

...

More weight also means more fuel and more wear and tear on the aircraft.


4 posted on 09/14/2015 7:05:21 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Reno89519
Guess that is a more polite way of saying they are too ugly to fly.

Yes, it is. If the concern was simply weight and its effect on the flight, they would have a cutoff in pounds/kilos as the criterion. Using a height/weight ratio says it's about the figure.

24 posted on 09/14/2015 8:00:05 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I want to live my cat's life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson