so, the victim is GUILTY.....what a country.....
Odd all around. In the Duke lacrosse case, the “rape kit” was sealed, then re-opened a couple of times weeks later and the info was altered to fit Mangum’s changing versions of events.
(Once sealed, those kits are supposed to not be opened until trial. They are evidence, and there is a strict chain of possession.)
Nobody was punished in that case for obstruction of justice or for evidence tampering or for attempting to frame innocent persons (for a crime which never happened).
If there was tampering in the Kane case, I don’t expect the DA to do anything (or anything more than just verbally admonish the rape “victim”).
i don’t abide by rape and i’m pretty sure its a common sentiment here. We don’t know who the victim is here yet. It nay be the accused or it may be the accuser. Your statement seems to assume Kane is guilty on this woman’s word.