Full Title: After Trump’s Huge Announcement, Something Sinister Was Uncovered About Fox News That Explains A Lot
Anyone who thinks that any of the other Republican candidates really takes the illegal invader problem seriously is deluding themselves.
And I frankly don't care.
Trump didn’t bring up this subject tonight on BOR.
He’s avoiding the REAL complete war. This debate spat is a sideshow and Trump will still go on Fox.
“Sinister”? Not at all.
It's worth reflecting IMHO on the multiple levels of wrong embedded in this question. First, Mrs. Kelly knew of course that this was to be America's first look at Trump as a Presidential candidate. The main themes of his campaign have been jobs, immigration, trade and foreign policy. How exactly is his years-old Twitter-feud with Rosie O'Donnell or an even older and entirely obscure comment made during his 14 seasons as host of the Apprentice in any way relevant to those issues?Second, to get into the weeds of the particular referenced comments, obviously if you're having a particular issue with one woman, that says nothing about what you do or do not think about all women, so the Rosie O'Donnell quote is completely asinine. And the random quote for the Apprentice, when the video from that was played back, there was obviously a whole context there that at the time nobody batted in eyelash about. In other words, maybe it's relevant if it was something that caused a stir at the time, but to drag it up when nobody at the time thought any of it is just so far out of bounds.
But the worst, worst thing about Mrs. Kelly's egregious abuse of her role as a supposedly neutral arbiter is her reference to the entirely and overtly partisan "War on Women" meme. Nobody except extremely partisan Democrats thinks that Republicans are waging on war on women, so to have it brought up and reinforced by a "moderator" of a Republican debate is just the height of duplicity.
It should be obvious to everyone that Kelly is using her current gig as a stepping stone to bigger and better things on network television, and collecting Trump's scalp would be the ultimate calling card for her in that quest. That Fox News is allowing her to crap all over their network is somewhat surprising . . . until you understand the relationship between the GOPe, Chamber of Commerce, etc. and Fox.
Trump would've IMHO been fully within his rights to have declared then and there that he was never going to participate in another debate with Megyn Kelly as the moderator, or even with Fox News as the producer. Given what's transpired between then and now, I think he's just that much more justified in doing so.
Trump wakes up in the morning and pi55es red, white, and blue American nationalism and nationalism scares the hell out of a lot of people. Others welcome it. I welcome it.
I tried to open link on my phone, but the page never fully opened. Instead several pop-up ads deployed. Wish your snippet was more descriptive. It looks like you bated us for clicks.
"The common denominator here is nothing less than that they (the elites) see Trump as undermining the elite consensus on immigration … and, implicitly, on the moral imperative of euthanizing White America."
This is about the survival of our very nation that a virtual handful of wealthy elites are frantically working to strip and plunder.
Here’s a “sinister” item:
Google “NOOR†(she is a Muslim on the internet) She called Trump a Nazi and is a radical.
She was invited by Google and okd by the RNC. They also had a woman Mexican and a Feminist (ALL INTERNET PEOPLE) all ready to attack him.
This is the ambush Megyn Kelly had planned for Trump.
Evidently, somebody tipped off Trump – and that’s why he hinted about not showing up.
When nothing happened, and FOX did not make any disclaimer about their plans, that’s when Trump knew he had caught them .. so he said he wasn’t going to attend.
What I want to know is .. who tipped off Trump about FOX’s plans ..??