Trump’s revolving door touchback amnesty plan is not acceptable. The “wall” Trump proposes is already law. My primary candidate at the time was responsible for getting it passed:
http://www.nytimes.com/cq/2007/07/11/cq_3057.html
Only Ted Cruz proposes actually following the law without the amnesty carrot and stick that all the others support.
But wasn't he FOR amnesty back in the middle of last year ?
Sorry but you can find nowhere that Ted Cruz addresses anything but AMNESTY for the hoards of invaders already here, with the single exception that one is “caught”. That one, Ted will deport, citing “federal law”.
I have personally seen TV interviews where he is asked on four different occasions about not the felons, but about those who are already here by the hundreds of thousands now, and TED CRUZ WILL NOT ANSWER.
He was for AMNESTY in his proposal amendment, citing enforcement of deportation law, only for those illegal invaders who are “caught”, which means felons. The rest who are already infiltrated quietly into our society, he said were eligible for “LEGALIZATION”, so they could come
“out of the shadows”.
Cruz has said nothing to the contrary since that amendment, but denies, instead, his own proposal.
Denial is not a strategy. Do we want red states turned blue, because Cruz is sympathetic to an invasion?
Yes, sympathetic. What else do you call no strategy, no accountability, no consequences, no deportations for the socialist hordes who are already here.
Wake up. If Cruz were not *for* AMNESTY, he would stop hiding behind his caterwalling remarks of diversion to the subject of felons, to cover up for having NOTHING to say about those gazillion here, illegally, who are not felons.
Cruz supports NO DEPORTTIONS but for felons. Check it out.
That is AMNESTY.
Crickets.