Replies

I often wonder about the results of any experiment, i.e., like Schroeder's cat.

Taking the "Jinks in the machine" and it's connection to human conciseness into consideration, how much of an effect does the conciseness of the scientist at the time have on the outcome of the experiment? If they "believe" there will be a certain outcome, wouldn't that interfere with the final results? If so, how much?

It's the perplexing mind over matter thing. How much does the conciseness of the scientists play a role? If thought is energy, and that energy resonates at a certain vibration, what affect would that have on particles - which themselves are energy? What about the possibility of entrainment?

(I think about weird stuff. So many questions and so little time.)