Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Four Out of Five of Obama’s Supreme Court Finalists Are Obama Donors
Washington Free Beacon ^ | March 10, 2016 | Brent Scher

Posted on 03/10/2016 3:17:14 PM PST by cba123

The White House has reportedly narrowed its list of potential Supreme Court nominees down to five people, and four of them have donated to Barack Obama's political campaigns.

The five federal judges who will be interviewed by the White House for the nomination are federal judges Sri Srinivasan (who has donated $4,250 to Obama), Jane Kelly ($1,500 to Obama), Paul Watford ($1,000 to Obama), Ketanji Brown Jackson ($450 to Obama), and Merrick Garland, who has not donated to Obama.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/four-out-of-five-of-obamas-supreme-court-finalists-are-obama-donors/

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: antoninscalia; ericholder; janekelly; ketanjibrownjackson; lorettalynch; merrickgarland; obama; obamadonors; paulwatford; scalia; scotus; scotusnominees; srisrinivasan; texas
This stinks.

Reeks, even.

1 posted on 03/10/2016 3:17:14 PM PST by cba123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cba123

http://freebeacon.com/politics/four-out-of-five-of-obamas-supreme-court-finalists-are-obama-donors/


2 posted on 03/10/2016 3:17:33 PM PST by cba123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Makes no diff.

Hasn’t been mentioned much on FR, but Judiciary Chair Grassley repeats forcefully almost every day that there will be NO hearings on Obama nominees.

McConnell would have to remove Grassley as Judiciary Chair if Mitch wants the Obama appointee.


3 posted on 03/10/2016 3:25:27 PM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

If you’re a DemonRat, you want a judicious, thoughtful positivist who’ll see reason when you drop a bag of money on the table.


4 posted on 03/10/2016 3:28:10 PM PST by lentulusgracchus ("If America was a house , the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutierrez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123
Four Out of Five of Obama’s Supreme Court Finalists Are Obama Donors

It is, of course, the Chicago style.

5 posted on 03/10/2016 3:29:27 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

If you can’t pick your friends, what is the point of even having the authority to nominate prospective members for the Supreme Court?

The Current Occupant, even in a fit of contrarian thinking, would never submit the name of any potential jurist he thought would be remotely acceptable to persons who believe in the sanctity of the law. Compliance with Constitutional principles is just not in his nature.

“Constitutional scholar” my aching, er, foot. The Current Occupant only ever studied the Constitution because he was looking for loopholes.


6 posted on 03/10/2016 3:33:25 PM PST by alloysteel (If I considered the consequences of my actions, I would rarely do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cba123

If only we had a GOP controlled Senate.


7 posted on 03/10/2016 3:39:48 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

The fifth Guy’s cheque is in the mail for sure.


8 posted on 03/10/2016 3:40:06 PM PST by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 -- 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Wow - an on-average couple thousand for a seat on the Supreme Court - not bad.....


9 posted on 03/10/2016 4:09:44 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Conflict of interest.

But of course lawyers and law firms routinely donte large sums of money to judges all the time.


10 posted on 03/10/2016 4:21:32 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

So, you can buy a seat on USSC?


11 posted on 03/10/2016 4:35:55 PM PST by Roger Kaputnik (Just because I'm paranoid doesn't prove that they aren't out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

The stupid and spiteful GOPe will give it to Obama, just so they can laugh at the Tea Party.

Then what?


12 posted on 03/10/2016 6:14:53 PM PST by IncPen (The Republican and Democrat Establishment are the same thing, determined to maintain their power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Well I guess we know which one wont get it.


13 posted on 03/11/2016 8:11:34 AM PST by patq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cba123

Surprise, surprise, surprise!

And the lousy Republicrats will assist the evil Obama regime as usual. They’ll either endorse his appointment, or they’ll sit back and say nothing.

SUPREME COURT FOR SALE


14 posted on 03/14/2016 3:45:23 PM PDT by HomerBohn (Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson