The’d best have some reliable evidence....
My initial reaction to this story was that the deceased continued his creepy camera work elsewhere, and the reception was less friendly, with no police involved. Do they have anything at all to link the Navy Man to the second crime scene? If not, no dice.
My first instinct without a lot of evidence to the contrary is that the Navy SEAL would not likely have followed and murdered the guy. Those guys are usually the best of the best.
Looks to me like the guy tripped over his camera.
I know a SEAL we did some work with who related this story of him on the invasion of Panama. When he and his team went in, they encountered some Panamanian forces. The got into a close fight with them. One of the Panamanians tries to stab my SEAL acquaintance in the stomach. He catches the knife with his bare hand on the way in, forces the knife back out and away from the Panamanian, and cuts his throat with it.
This Anderson guy was not killed by a SEAL. He would not have languished in an alley with head and knife injuries. He would simply be dead.
Those officers committed a crime, ordering ‘destruction of evidence’. What F’ing idiots.
The SEAL didn’t do this .
Beating in the head and knifed and left to bleed out is how hood rats fight.
Skeptical... The SEAL would not have used a knife when a broken neck would have sufficed.
Krah says he drove back to SD by himself soon after the original incident. I hope there is time-stamped security cam evidence proving he was out of the area before the perv’s death.
Paging Leroy Gibbs - sounds like a plot for NCIS!