Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: montypythonsflyingcircus

Taxing the rich at 90% would gain a little revenue the first year and revenues would decline thereafter, possibly precipitously. The rich would cease earning taxable income and would rapidly change their citizenship and domicile. Lower and lower incomes and assets would then be defined as “rich” of necessity and the middle class would utterly cease to exist in only a couple of year. I suppose this would be regarded as a successful policy by the liberals and the communists.


11 posted on 08/28/2016 11:02:18 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus

There were tons of loopholes in the 1950s. This is liberal la la land.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324705104578151601554982808


15 posted on 08/28/2016 11:08:21 AM PDT by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: arthurus

Hence my tag line lo these seven years.


41 posted on 08/28/2016 11:25:23 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson