To: orchestra
Comey added an “intent” clause to the law. There is not and never has been an “intent” clause in the law.
Then he tells us that anyone else committing the same acts as Clinton would have been prosecuted.
But now he says it wasn’t even a close call?
Is he on drugs?
To: savedbygrace
He sniffs criminal hillary’s Depend.
20 posted on
09/07/2016 4:11:26 PM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
To: savedbygrace
One cannot intend to be negligent.
If there was intent...it’s espionage.
28 posted on
09/07/2016 4:22:47 PM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: savedbygrace
She is guilty even with the intent clause!
29 posted on
09/07/2016 4:23:21 PM PDT by
SgtHooper
(If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson