That’s Exactly what I want to know, too!
BTW: the North American Union agreement we’re secretly bound to require full integration between Canada, the USA and Mexico.
NAU from what I understand excludes Central America.
That may be why Obola would aid Mexico with its southern border control.
NAU, them new Amero currency, once the dollar crashes against the Chinese gold backed Special Drawing Rights basket of currencies.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=z1NZ23Lp6L4
RE: “How does the president spend $75 million without congress?
Let alone a few billion for Iran?”
The whole omnibus spending habit should be made illegal. They do it on purpose. It's a scam. They should all be in prison for it (congress).
The omnibus budgets are a back door way for the executive branch to control the purse, which is the duty of congress. It should be challenged in court, which also gets it’s budget funds the same way so I wouldn’t count on it.
CBC 2015 report regarding North American Union
CBC, that US and Canadian border agents can work within each other’s countries.
Will they do so within the context of a unified command? The details are yet unclear but when governmental agents work by treaty in each other’s country, it’s certainly a step toward a bureaucratic union.
The increased overlap between Mexico and the US is being driven by a reduction in immigration controls that is intended to allow more legal cross-border travel.
In Canada, where resistance to a merger with the US is even higher than in Mexico, bureaucratic unity drives the program. And it seems obviously to be a program. A series of treaties and joint accords are gradually binding the governments of the three countries into an ever-tighter embrace.
Here’s more:
Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney and Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson have signed a customs pre-clearance agreement for rail, land and sea travel that was years in the making. The arrangement would allow customs agents to work in each other’s countries, which means they could screen passengers away from the border and ease the choke points.
… Maryscott Greenwood of the Canadian American Business Council said the agreement will use modern technology to speed up things at the border. “It’s dramatic, it’s historic, it’s a big day in Canada-U.S. relations,” she said. The statement says the agreement applies to all modes of transport, which could include passenger vehicles. It also says customs agents will be allowed to carry firearms in each other’s countries.
We can see from Greenwood’s comments that this isn’t merely a border agreement designed to enhance efficiency. She is casting it in historical terms, especially given that agents will be “allowed to carry firearms in each other’s country.”
This notable event in Canada becomes even more noticeable when one realizes that a similar arrangement has just been announced in Mexico.
From the Albuquerque Journal: “Mexico set to allow armed U.S. customs officials within its borders.”
Here’s more:
A Mexican initiative to allow U.S. customs officials to carry weapons in the country could clear the way for customs inspections inside Mexico’s assembly plants, alleviating congestion at border crossings.
New Mexico’s border industries, as well as Mexico’s maquila assembly plants, have been pressing for years for a program that would allow customs inspectors to clear goods before they reach a port of entry.
One major obstacle has been Mexico’s ban prohibiting U.S. law enforcement from carrying their guns in Mexico. Mexico President Enrique Peña Nieto last month asked the country’s Congress to lift the long-standing taboo.
In a proposal sent to Mexico’s Senate, Peña Nieto underscored that Mexico’s economy depends in a large part on the competitiveness of its border and proposed allowing foreign governments’ customs inspectors to work alongside the country’s own.