Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dallas59

there is some concern over the domain names (top level) because there is no agreement in place to assure continued control over top level domains such as .mil, .gov, or country specific such as .us.
ICANN does control the naming. they do not control the physical internet. But we always say “oh well they would never do that”. and we know how that ends up.


54 posted on 09/30/2016 9:49:44 PM PDT by visualops (It's the majority of the American people and Trump against the enemies of the republic - Windflier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: visualops
Lol...I remember the "whitehouse.com problem...

Part of the controversy about whitehouse.com was that users (especially minors in most cases) wishing to visit the website of the White House (www.whitehouse.gov) could easily go to the adult website instead. Although .gov, a top-level domain (TLD), is available only to official government sites in the United States, .com is a much more common TLD and is frequently entered by mistake. In addition, many web browsers add '.com' to the end of an address if no suffix is entered, so simply typing 'whitehouse' into the address bar would lead one to whitehouse.com. Because of the explicit and commercial content of the site, it was frequently cited as one of the most egregious examples of domain name misuse, up until the domain was sold.

Many school children in the late 1990s inadvertently saw adult content via the website.

The website whitehouse.org, a humor site that formerly satirized the former U.S. president George W. Bush, remains controversial for similar reasons, although less so because its content is usually much less explicit.

In 2006, PC World ranked Whitehouse.com #13 on its list "The 25 Worst Web Sites".

Opposition

In December 1997, the Clinton administration sent Dan Parisi a cease and desist letter stating, "... we do not challenge your right to pursue it or to exercise your First Amendment rights, but we do challenge your right to use the White House, the President, and the First Lady as a marketing device. For adult internet users, that device is, at the least, part of a deceptive scheme. For younger Internet users, it has more disturbing consequences." The letter had no effect and the site stayed up.
59 posted on 09/30/2016 10:00:26 PM PDT by Dallas59 (Only a fool stumbles on things behind him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson