Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lower Deck

“If she had been tried and convicted you might have an argument. But she wasn’t.”

She’s guilty of having removed classified government documents from their secured place of custody. The Director of the FBI told the nation that she committed that offense.

That she broke the law is not in question. That the corrupt Obama administration let her off the hook in the face of such evidence, is not in question. The penalties for breaking the law are not in question.

The only question is, who will bring her to justice. Obviously, the American people will have to enforce the statute by denying her entry to the oval office.


104 posted on 10/16/2016 5:18:42 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier
She’s guilty of having removed classified government documents from their secured place of custody. The Director of the FBI told the nation that she committed that offense.

To repeat, if Clinton had been tried and convicted then you would have a case. People saying that she is guilty isn't the same thing.

110 posted on 10/16/2016 1:51:33 PM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson