Posted on 10/19/2016 8:50:44 PM PDT by fuzzylogic
The creepiest thing about her though is she seems to positively enjoy lying. Most people feel a pang of guilt, but its like the instinct is upside down in her, she seems to only really come alive and enjoy herself when she is lying.
The way her eyes were positioned, it almost seemed as if she were reading some form of laser hologram that was emitting near the top of her lectern (if such a thing even exists).
Rigged debate questions/answers again!
But it did her no good!!!!
Its possible she needs different lighting due to her medical stuff. Recall one is not supposed to flash lights near her.
Yes, she had the same light as last time. Every time she pounded the podium was an excuse to look down. Even when Trump had the rebuttal, she was busy scribbling but that was also an excuse to look down to read whatever. Notice her notepad - scribbles. The camera at the end stayed off Mr. Sneaky when he was at her podium but it did catch him handing something off to someone on the floor.
Also, notice how blurry he is compared to her.
Yes, Virginia, the election is rigged.
same podium she used in the first debate which was loaded with stuff some sleezy guy took away after debate and had a screen just like the one tonight
She had the questions in advance and her staff prepared the answers, all she had to do is read them.
The very same guy who did that the last time, it might be noted.
wonder if Chris Wallace will retire and buy a big house on the coast like Bernie did?
That was shown in the first debate too. Something is up.
Everyone...I know this isn’t obvious but watch the ENTIRE debate again and pay attention to the amount of time each candidate spends looking down. I don’t care if she took notes, it seems like that may have been part of the “act” - look like you’re reading from notes - but pay attention to the time she spends “taking notes” vs. the amount of time she continues to take clues from something she’s reading. THIS IS ODD...just watch again and you’ll see it. She is reading, only going into “standard boilerplate speech stuff” as rehearsed but anything that is unanticipated is really weird, she is reading stuff...it’s obvious if you’re looking for it.
She was definitely reading from something, my guess was an iPad pro using the Apple pencil to take notes. Probably screaming HELP!
She was just reciting. Like an automaton.
Avoiding any actual communication with pre-programmed talking points.
Running out the clock.
“Her answers were canned, and contents of the can did not match the realities of the conversation.”
Exactly.
I wonder if she was trying to hood her eyes in case one started to wander off again.
[“Her answers were canned, and contents of the can did not match the realities of the conversation.”]
HILLARY knew she lost the debate. Heh. Heh.
My daughter in the Cayman’s kept texting that same message to me:
LOOK, she’s READING!
Did anyone notice how red and glazed over her eyes were?
I noticed her looking down every few seconds. I kept commenting to my husband about her eyes always darting down.
I disagree due to the information I’ve seen from Wikileaks. I don’t believe this moderator was in-bed with her campaign...unless it was someone else feeding her. If she knew the questions ahead of time it doesn’t explain the amount of time she spent looking down at the same spot...as though it was providing info. Watch again through this lens, then you see it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.