To: Admiral_Zeon
Wonder why it’s not reduced by 100%?
Does Norway think Hillary will invite it to a cocktail party?
9 posted on
11/19/2016 3:54:37 PM PST by
GnuThere
To: GnuThere
Maybe they’re trying to keep on the good side of the Clinton’s on the off chance that Chelsea gets into Congress. That’s the only reason I can think of for an 87% reduction, instead of 100%.
17 posted on
11/19/2016 4:04:28 PM PST by
EvilCapitalist
(At least Richard Nixon had the decency to resign when caught in wrong doing.)
To: GnuThere
They’re waiting to see if Chelsie has a successful run for Congress.
38 posted on
11/19/2016 4:58:30 PM PST by
SauronOfMordor
(Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson