Former UK Ambassador Has Met the DNC Leaker
by S. Noble • December 15, 2016
Craig Murray on the left
The controversial former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray is an ally of Julian Assange and he insists he has met the leaker of the DNC and Clinton emails and it is not the Russians. The Russians did not hack the emails according to his numerous interviews and writings. We reported on this once before but have been reluctant to repeat it since Mr. Murray has a very colorful history of making some comments that people might call extreme and, like Assange, he has ties to the far-left.
However, we are hearing extreme comments from the hysterical and conspiratorial left with their handful of GOP collaborators as well. The US left is now the fringe, so which fringe shall we believe?
On the 11th, Mr. Craig wrote on his website:
I have watched incredulous as the CIA’s blatant lie has grown and grown as a media story – blatant because the CIA has made no attempt whatsoever to substantiate it. There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption.
He offers two point which are logical, more logical than what our administration is putting out:
A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims. The CIA claim they “know the individuals” involved. Yet under Obama the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through extradition. We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilise a US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals? Plainly it stinks. The anonymous source claims of “We know who it was, it was the Russians” are beneath contempt.
As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.
Read at:
http://www.independentsentinel.com/former-uk-ambassador-has-met-the-dnc-leaker/
The source of the leaks does not bother me as much as the content exposed in the emails. I feel the continued emphasis on the source rather than content is an attempt to “whitewash” the incident and pave the way for another Hillary run, her health permitting.
This is satire
Man folks need to lighten up a little