Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessean4Bush
I had assumed...

I had assumed...

I had assumed....

Sounds like this guy did not do any fact checking just assumed.

Aren't reporters suppose to check things out for themselves?

3 posted on 12/29/2016 7:00:02 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Read the article. He does precisely that, he investigates his assumptions and finds that he was wrong.


4 posted on 12/29/2016 7:02:11 PM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Aren't reporters suppose to check things out for themselves?

While he was slow to realize Snopes had a leftist bias and did not have rigorous processes, I have no objection to him recognizing he had assumed things that turned out not to be so...provided he really meant "assume" in that he was not committed to the proposition, but it was the working assumption before evidence was gathered. What one should not do is "presume" in the sense of committing oneself to a position before having good evidence.

28 posted on 12/30/2016 3:30:13 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson