Yes. This is expected. Anyone in this field sees what a vapid report it was.
I'm not even in the field and I can see how bad that report is. Most of it is suggestions on how to be secure with your computer ( which Podesta might not have read). I'm certainly an end user, and we have a higher level of security on our networks at the office because it is considered critical infrastructure.
I’m about as techie as an Amish Grandma, and even I can see what a vapid report it is. My take on the report is that it is intentionally vague enough that the administration can use it (intelligence was undoubtedly under tremendous pressure to produce something DNC could “use”) but also inconclusive enough that under a different administration, and different pressure, they can say, “Well, we DID issue it with a disclaimer, and we DIDN’T say anything that was technically untrue, but we never claimed that it was conclusive....” Cover the butt on both sides, you know?