Posted on 01/13/2017 11:37:15 PM PST by Swordmaker
I feel a lot better than last week at this time. . . still weak though. Thanks for the concern.
Good to see you posting again. Best wishes for a full recovery.
I agree. . . they probably thought it was going to be "cool" to be paid to look at porn all day. They didn't realize how truly mind numbing it would be and then they found out it was also degrading. . . and then the ennui.
It will never reach court. I just ran it by my girlfriend who is Nurse Case Manager for major company that works with people wending their way through the gates of Workers Comp in California (most states have the same rules about what workers can sue their employers for) and she says this is clearly a Workers Compensation Case and will be denied because the workers have no standing to sue their employer under Washington's Workers Compensation laws.
I would think they could automate this for the most part by using the image search like google has at their website.
One thing to remember is that federal law requires companies to perform such content review. The following law requires companies to report to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children any content fitting a certain profile. Someone has to review those images.
18 U_S_ Code § 2258A - Reporting requirements of electronic communication service providers and remote computing service providers US Law LII - Legal Information Institute
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.