Posted on 01/27/2017 12:25:40 PM PST by heterosupremacist
I am still waiting for the Cowboys and Mooselimbs to get started...
Muster up Diaper Heads, form a line.
Now that is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard about Martin Luther. Just because people tried to appropriate his name and fame later on in History does not mean Luther would have agreed with anything they said and did. With respect to Hitler’s comment, the whole concept of getting rid of the Bible would be 100% opposite of what Luther stood for, i.e. subordinating everything to the Bible and bringing it to the people. One of the chief slogans of the Reformation was not sola scriptura for nothing.
yeah, this writer can be a little shoe-batty
Re : Post #3
I don’t think the author meant to discredit Luther, nor do I.
Re : Post #3
...yeah, this writer can be a little shoe-batty...
Congratulations! You just invented a word - nothing less than a sublime, genius, and ultimately; DESCRIPTIVE word! That describes my/our frustrations perfectly!
You should © copyright that at once, and submit your entry to Merriam-Webster.com immediately! (or at least UrbanDictionary.com ??)
I only post the articles, nobody will allow me to legally edit them. GRRR!
Complete and unadulterated bullcrap.
Luther has been dead for 500 years. No evil done in any time since he died can legitimately be laid at his feet.
This is just anti-Protestant hate mongering.
And it doesn't take much to figure out it's source.
We could be heading into The Big One. God Knows the Globalists are not going to go quietly.
The view(s) of the author(s) I post do not necessarily reflect MY views.
I beg your pardon.
This is one of the lamest articles I’ve ever seen. Unless the author can substantiate their claim this article belongs on the Onion. Not. FR.
This article is posted in chat, not in the Religion Forum.
I didn’t say they did.
I’m sorry if it came across that way.
It was not my intent.
The comment was about the authors statement, not your posting of the thread.
Dang. That is one LONG article. It will take a dummy like me days to wade through it. I’ve had shorter chemistry texts.
We DO???
Well, since only one nation on earth ever became Fascist, and it quickly lost and failed, and not one singe national movement has taken place yet in the 70 years since, would be a significant indicator that Fascism isn't on the rise.
We DO???
The views/opinions of the author posted do Not necessarily reflect the opinion(s) of the poster.
This is becoming tiresome, it would be simpler to post a disclaimer before I post again...
:^)
new tagline :
The views/opinions of the author posted do Not necessarily reflect the views/opinion(s) of the poster.
D’uh!
new tagline :
The views/opinions of the author posted do Not necessarily reflect the views/opinion(s) of the poster.
Fascism is not on the rise, but people who protest ‘fascism’ certainly IS on the rise!
.
Shoebat doesn’t keep his bats in his shoes, most of them are in his belfry.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.