Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Roman_War_Criminal

The operative words being “win the war”. There us no second place prize in war. While his tactical abilities were average at best, his strategic thinking was head and shoulders above his peers. Before the war ended, Grant would accept the surrender of 3 Confederate armies.


52 posted on 03/11/2017 3:55:54 PM PST by Bull Snipe (ueewl ocwe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Bull Snipe

Winfield Scott wrote down the plans for how to win the war before Ft. Sumter was even fired upon.

Generals & politicians laughed him into retirement. Ironically it played out almost exactly as he wrote them down in 1861.

Grant’s success was in that he used his resources. And he was the only one who really did. This is where others like the timid McClellan, the over-confident Hooker, and the overly defensive Meade couldn’t succeed.

McClellan was so timid that he over-estimated the Rebel forces during the Seven Days campaign as outnumbering him almost by 50,000 men.

Napoloen won battles similarly to Grant. Charge, charge, and charge again. He won, but the cost was a lot higher than it should’ve been unfortunately.


56 posted on 03/12/2017 9:52:25 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson