you mean like what... actual evidence?
OK let’s see it...
During the Sessions confirmation hearings, franken distinguished himself by saying repeatedly that he isn’t a lawyer. What he may be, though, is a legal alchemist, converting non-evidence into evidence.
First, define the crime that was SUPPOSED to have been committed.
Then, how would this “crime”, if any, relate back to any action by Donald Trump, or any of his campaign, or any of his Administration.
“Anonymous sources” are not a reliable link to reality, if they exist at all.
Fake news RULES!! Goebbels would be so proud, that the strategy closely associated with his name should have such an enduring quality, tested by time. < /sarcasm >
How about an actual charge?
“Collusion” alone means nothing, akin to accusing one of “libel” without any verbiage to dub libelous.
Everything eh?
Name one thing