No easy answer. However it should be noted that the time and resources spent on the hopelessly ill would feed a lot of starving children. Sorry but resources are limited and you can’t always do both. “Heroic” actions are not always wise or ethical.
“time and resources spent on the hopelessly ill” who happen to have deep pockets and/or connections to someone with deep pockets.
Parents who cannot provide for their children shouldn't be procreating.
Of course in this country we reward those irresponsible people with food, housing, welfare. That produces more irresponsible people.
Maybe the Brits will ask you to turn his life support switch off.
You seem like the perfect person for that job.
Maybe get a selfie of yourself doing it.
However it should be noted that the time and resources spent on the hopelessly ill would feed a lot of starving children.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And there were some that had indignation within themselves, and said, Why was this waste of the ointment made?
For it might have been sold for more than three hundred pence, and have been given to the poor. And they murmured against her.
Perhaps you would like to take the 1.5 million dollars raised by the parents at gunpoint and then smother Charlie.
That way you could feel free to redistribute their finite resources to those who deserve it more... like yourself. Because everybody deserves an Escalade, a pair of Air Jordans, and some big gold necklaces, am I right?
Maybe a new dacha, comrade! Imagine it! Because those Cossacks most assuredly don’t deserve all those rubles!