Posted on 07/31/2017 5:56:16 AM PDT by simpson96
This is like an iceberg, 90% of which is below the waterline.
In the exchanges of 140 character tweets between Robin and Clinton, there's no real argument.
It's not clear what it's about.
They're just trading insults.
After Corey Robin explained his view at excruciating length, I could see that he was probably right about the use of the phrase, but just from the tweets alone, it was impossible to tell what the whole disagreement was actually about.
My takeaways:
1) Twitter is useless for serious discussion.
2) Corey Robin is obsessive, forever splitting picayune hairs, arrogant when he thinks he's right, and unwilling to admit that he may be wrong (all of which those who read his books may already have figured out).
3) There are people on the left who really hate Chelsea Clinton and her parents and wish Chelsea would just go away.
"Clichés, stock phrases, adherence to conventional, standardized codes of expression and conduct have the socially recognized function of protecting us against reality, that is, against the claim on our thinking attention that all events and facts make by virtue of their existence." Hannah Arendt
Strangely, that was my first thought about Chels missive.
Corey Robin best sleep with a gun under his pillow.
Well What I was led to conclude from Chels side of the twitting was that she thinks the Genderconfused are actually evil, not just mentally troubled.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.