Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chelsea Clinton Got Into A Twitter Fight Over Hannah Arendt
Forward.com ^ | 7/30/2017 | Aiden Pink

Posted on 07/31/2017 5:56:16 AM PDT by simpson96

Think about how much worse life would be without the internet. We wouldn’t have video chats on Skype. We wouldn’t have baby pandas sneezing on YouTube. And we wouldn’t have Chelsea Clinton getting into an argument over philosophy and Nazism on Twitter.

It started when the former First Daughter tweeted a Washington Post article on Friday about an arson attack at a Phoenix LGBT center, along with the message “The banality of evil” — a phrase coined by 20th-century Jewish philosopher Hannah Arendt in her classic book “Eichmann in Jerusalem.”

Brooklyn College political science professor Corey Robin thought that Clinton had misunderstood the phrase. “This is what happens when you know something as a cliche or slogan rather than as an idea,” he tweeted at her. “Totally the opposite of what Arendt meant. Sidwell Friends, Stanford, Oxford, Columbia: all that money for fancy schools, and nowhere did you learn the meaning of this phrase?”

But, to Robin’s surprise, Clinton responded, asking whether Robin had actually read the Post article and noted that she was “thankful to have read Arendt at Sidwell & Stanford.”

(Excerpt) Read more at forward.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: chelsea; chelseairrelevant; chelseatweet; clinton; dopeydems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 07/31/2017 5:56:16 AM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: simpson96

They both should STFU.


2 posted on 07/31/2017 6:04:43 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

She’s ditz. An ugly loudmouth ditz.

She wouldn’t know Hannah Arendt from Hannah Montana.


3 posted on 07/31/2017 6:06:49 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

Whether she’s right or wrong, the tone of condescension in Chelsea’s reply was sickening.

She’s now fully formed - smug limosine liberal.


4 posted on 07/31/2017 6:09:31 AM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Just finished reading Corey Robin’s blog article about the encounter. While I agree that Chelsea did not understand “the banality of evil”, I was equally annoyed with the author’s constant patting of himself on the back for having engaged in an intellectual duel with the lightweight Chelsea.


5 posted on 07/31/2017 6:10:08 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Very interesting. The phrase was in her system.


6 posted on 07/31/2017 6:10:30 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

How could this woman think that an arson attack was banal?

Of course, lately that famous phrase has been in the business of being debunked. It came about because Eichmann was a busy little beaver bureaucrat of the monstrous final solution.


7 posted on 07/31/2017 6:12:56 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Insight into the left. Clinton she shares a very particular view of evil. This one, for some reason, I find revealing.


8 posted on 07/31/2017 6:12:58 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Because of a psychosis?


9 posted on 07/31/2017 6:13:30 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

He engaged in a takedown of the stupidest woman in America - a woman who has political ambitions, no doubt. He did fine. She finally ran away from his educated tweets.

Why do you have a problem with that?


10 posted on 07/31/2017 6:19:22 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

” for having engaged in an intellectual duel with the lightweight Chelsea”

Is that like engaging in a gunfight with someone who’s carrying a cap pistol?


11 posted on 07/31/2017 6:21:20 AM PDT by tgusa (gun control: hitting your target.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

I refuse to get into a battle of wits with an unarmed person...............


12 posted on 07/31/2017 6:23:51 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Isn’t Herself a Brown graduate? If so, doesn’t say much about the Ivy League.


13 posted on 07/31/2017 6:25:03 AM PDT by tgusa (gun control: hitting your target.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
...she was “thankful to have read Arendt at Sidwell & Stanford.”

I call bullsh*t.

14 posted on 07/31/2017 6:25:35 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

The banality of liberalism.....................


15 posted on 07/31/2017 6:26:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Chelsea has lots of wit; half, dim, nit...


16 posted on 07/31/2017 6:27:56 AM PDT by fungoking (Tis a pleasure to live in the 0zarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

Hell would be to be stuck forever in a room listening to Chelsea Clinton and Corey Robin.

“L’enfer c’est les autres.”

Sartre, “hell is other people.” Well, certain other people. Such as Chelsea Clinton and Corey Robin.

Smug limousine libtard vs smug academic twit.


17 posted on 07/31/2017 6:28:16 AM PDT by Enchante (Searching throughout the country for one honest Democrat....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Your description is dismissive. I can guess why. Clinton made the mistake of discussing evil, which the first reply rightly noticed. The first reply really defends Clinton—don’t talk about evil.


18 posted on 07/31/2017 6:30:56 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

So she did learn from Barack Obama after all. Never let a good crisis go to waste. She saw another opportunity to pander to the LGBTLMNOP crowd, and took it, regardless of the facts or motive behind the attack. Just like a good little liberal.


19 posted on 07/31/2017 6:34:18 AM PDT by Hat-Trick (Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
Why do you have a problem with that?

I don't have a problem with the smackdown of Chelsea at all. But if you read his blog account, it is dripping with self-aggrandizement as he describes blow-by-blow how he destroyed her argument and how flabbergasted he was that "Chelsea read my tweet". The twitter exchange should have stood on its own. His recounting of the exchange on his blog reminded me of the commercial in which a fisherman describes his battle to land a huge ferocious fish, which turns out to be about the size of a sardine.

20 posted on 07/31/2017 6:38:43 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson