If it’s zot worthy then so be it. But the actual text of the law doesn’t seem to accord with the vague but threatening alarmism of this poorly written and un-sourced article.
If you can’t see that as a danger, then you’re mentally ill or a troll...probably both.
Expect what you are receiving.
First and Foremost is “The right to keep and bear arms will not be infringed”.
This is the bedrock because this is the only amendment until recently that the left wants removed. They have since moved up to #1.
No authority can remove your right to own a gun. Courts can remove that right through felony convictions.
That slippery slope starts with all the mumbo jumbo that puts grandma in a group home.
Is it harder to zot in a membership drive?
The law is an attempt to avoid proper neurological and mental evaluations in favor of using accusations from hens and police instead. Radical social activists (e.g., feminists) have given propaganda presentations to police departments and academies.
Such policies keep families scattered and less able to rise as new and productive business competition. The same policies send many more cases to lawyers.
Perhaps you are unaware of mental illness
being used to justify stripping people of rights in Soviet Russia — it is not such a far cry that non-alignment with the political party can be used as proof of mental illness.