Posted on 09/03/2017 8:40:12 AM PDT by Rusty0604
Next week, the House of Representatives will consider an appropriations bill,.... Some members, Republican and Democratic alike, have submitted amendment to the bill that would defund the directive issued by Attorney General Jeff Sessions to ramp up the use of civil asset forfeiture.
Sessions is a vocal advocate of civil asset forfeiture, the process by which local law enforcement can permanently seize property or money that is suspected to have a connection to a crime.
During an April 2015 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, then-Sen. Sessions was less than sympathetic toward a witness, Russ Caswell, whose hotel was wrongly seized when local law enforcement claimed that it had facilitated illicit activity.
Sessions read from letters from law enforcement officials in support of forfeiture while addressing Caswell and defending the pernicious practice, which is often abused. He downplayed the instances in which the legitimately owned property of innocent people — who were never arrested, charged or convicted of any wrongdoing — was seized by law enforcement, who, in most states and at the federal level, can keep all or part of the proceeds from forfeiture.
Sessions was criticized for the directive. “Back in May I encouraged the Department of Justice to review its policies on civil asset forfeiture in light of increasing indications from the Supreme Court that this practice is constitutionally suspect,” said Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah). “Instead of revising forfeiture practices in a manner to better protect Americans’ due process rights, the DOJ seems determined to lose in court before it changes its policies...”
Similarly, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) noted that adoptive seizures “have created perverse incentives in the past that jeopardized the rights of law abiding citizens.”
Thankfully, four amendments have been submitted to the House Rules Committee for consideration that would defund Sessions’ directive.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
“... defund the directive issued by Attorney General Jeff Sessions to ramp up the use of civil asset forfeiture”
What is this ... I am sure I saw an article a few weeks ago saying that Sessions was working to eliminate CAF ... ???
Unfortunately, it seems that CAF is self funding.
They are always “working on” things, but they deliver very little.
They don’t get credit with me until they DO it.
If the activist courts were truly following the Constitution, civil asset forfeiture prior to trial and conviction, would have been declared unconstitutional long ago.
“Sessions is a vocal advocate of civil asset forfeiture, the process by which local law enforcement can permanently seize property or money that is suspected to have a connection to a crime.”
Another reason to get rid of this worthless little pr*ck!
The War on Drugs sure worked out well for the American people. About as well as the 86 amnesty.
Quite the opposite unfortunately.
No, he’s all for it.
The fact that Sessions enabled and advocated increased asset forfeiture is proof he is an enemy of the American People.
Yes, it will have to go to SCOTUS.
CAF is theft by force of arms. And at least the Mafia had a code of ethics — government not does not. CAF needs to be abolished now!
“They are always “working on” things, but they deliver very little.”
I agree 100%. My Congresswoman tells me the legislative process is complex and lengthy.
Let’s see, 1 hour to draft a bill ending civil asset forfeiture. One day to review it in committee, make revisions if necessary, and send it to the Speaker to schedule a floor vote. Thirty minutes to hold a floor vote and pass it on to the Senate. One day (or less) for the Senate committee to review it and send to leadership for a floor vote. Thirty minutes for the vote. Bill passed and sent to the President for signature. Presidential signing ceremony 5 minutes. Mission accomplished. Less than 1 week if you really want to get something done.
Conclusions:
1) They don’t want to get something accomplished. Witness repeal of Obamacare which could have been accomplished by simply passing again a bill they had already passed and Obama had vetoed.
2) If they truly can’t work with speed, the institution is incapable of governance in the 21st century and needs to be completely overhauled.
3) The leadership isn’t leading.
YESSSSSSS!!!!!!
. The ole "connection to crime" usually doesn't show up in real practice. They seize at will in most cases.
. The ole "connection to crime" usually doesn't show up in real practice. They seize at will in most cases.
“Sessions is a vocal advocate of civil asset forfeiture”
He is a member of our irredeemably corrupt and depraved political class. Of course he favors theft by government abuse.
So the individual states will just ramp up their efforts.
The only reason the legislative process is complex and lengthy is because congress wants it that way. I bet you they can sure come up with legislation to save the dreamers in less than a week. Because screwing the American citizens is one thing they can all agree on.
Some members, Republican and Democratic alike, have submitted amendment to the bill that would defund the directive.
Cartel makes deal with Republican and Democratic bribees.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.