Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: heterosupremacist
2 posted on
09/12/2017 4:02:33 PM PDT by
heterosupremacist
(Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
To: heterosupremacist
Relax....it was mostly young boys.....
3 posted on
09/12/2017 4:03:25 PM PDT by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: heterosupremacist
4 posted on
09/12/2017 4:06:13 PM PDT by
aynrandfreak
(Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
To: heterosupremacist
I just do not get it.
Osama Bin Laden and Hillary Clinton can do anything including mass murder and they are protected because they might be embarrassed.....!!
To: heterosupremacist
HOW IN HELL oops sorry, how in hell does pornography qualify for “classified” status? Are the pictures vital to the
national defense of the USA, and if so...how?
7 posted on
09/12/2017 4:09:42 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
To: heterosupremacist
It is safe to assume the worst here.
8 posted on
09/12/2017 4:10:38 PM PDT by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: heterosupremacist
So if you leave out the porn in those files, all that’s left would fit on a floppy disk.
To: heterosupremacist
BURN THEM!!! NOT worth garbaging up one brain cell!!
12 posted on
09/12/2017 4:13:30 PM PDT by
pollywog
(" O thou who changest not....ABIDE with me")
To: All
To: heterosupremacist
Why not release it so the world can see what a pervert he really was?
To: heterosupremacist
Ted Cruz is disappointed...
He’s clearly desperate for new spank material...
17 posted on
09/12/2017 4:18:39 PM PDT by
ObozoMustGo2012
("Be quiet... you are #fakenews!")
To: heterosupremacist
That’s fine with me. Who wants to see a bunch of photos of naked goats anyway? Bill Clinton would probably hit on them though.
19 posted on
09/12/2017 4:26:00 PM PDT by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
To: heterosupremacist
20 posted on
09/12/2017 4:30:56 PM PDT by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: heterosupremacist
21 posted on
09/12/2017 4:33:33 PM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: heterosupremacist
Probably just pictures of goats anyway.
22 posted on
09/12/2017 4:43:49 PM PDT by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
To: heterosupremacist
>>So how is this information considered not “operational” or unimportant about “holy” head of al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden?
Obama gave Osama a respectful Islamic funeral ceremony paid for by US taxpayers.
Let that sink in.
Can’t “spike the football”. Except “we” can use Obama GOT Osama as a campaign slogan.
23 posted on
09/12/2017 4:50:42 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
To: heterosupremacist
We don’t need the actual movies, just release a manifest of the ‘Metadata’. Remember? That harmless data the government collects on everyone - filenames?
To: heterosupremacist
muslime kiddie porn...
25 posted on
09/12/2017 4:59:39 PM PDT by
Chode
(You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
To: heterosupremacist
The Pentagon wants to divvy it up ‘mongst themselves.
Just as plausible. Maybe even more.
30 posted on
09/12/2017 5:15:24 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: heterosupremacist
Because Bill Clinton’s reading it?
32 posted on
09/12/2017 6:01:41 PM PDT by
jmacusa
("Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
