To: BenLurkin
In 0bama’s world it would have been ‘well okay’ but in Trump’s world: “Oh hey, you really don’t want to be going there”.
2 posted on
10/16/2017 4:43:01 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
To: SkyDancer
9 posted on
10/16/2017 4:51:32 PM PDT by
Terry Mross
(Liver spots And blood thinners.)
To: SkyDancer
Obama just wanted both Iran and NK to go nuclear after he left office. Beyond that, he could not have cared less.
11 posted on
10/16/2017 4:53:28 PM PDT by
rbg81
(Truth is stranger than fiction)
To: SkyDancer
In 0bamas world it would have been well okay but in Trumps world: Oh hey, you really dont want to be going there.
Go where, exactly? I refuses to go behind a WP paywall, but the headline seems misleading and melodramatic. He is not saying that he would start a nuclear war, but rather that they wouldn't sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty. What do you think that Trump's reaction to that refusal would be? Given what has happened to countries that played ball (Libya, for example), wouldn't it make more sense for potential adversaries, such as NK, to not sign?
Basically, I don't how this moves the needle, much, if at all. His statement about nuclear war perhaps starting is not a statement of intent, but rather a segue into the point that NK needs to be able to defend itself (not an accurate deduction, but hardly the the-world-is-about-to-end connotation implied by the headline). In fact, while NK may be the most evil, hideous, and cruel government to exist in at least 1/2 a century (if not much more), it is hard to see what is wrong with NK's position on this one. Signing the NPT would be a disaster for them, with no upside. Is there something else in the article that is of importance?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson