It can mean whatever you want it to mean. Sort of like “change you can believe in”
--as dozens of Dr Jerome Corsi, Dustin Nemos et al's commentaries have demonstrated, documented over and over and over--probably now 50-100 times.
The specifics between Q-Anon's cryptic coded posts and the decoded specifics from President Trump and/or publicly reported events are quite clear and quite reasonable. Ocham's razor applies in case after case after case.
Construing such evidence as proof that Q-Anon would not be who he holds himself out to be would be A LOT more improbable, convoluted, irrational, by far.
If you cannot examine the evidence and prove that to yourself, then I'm sad for you but not about to try and lead yet another horse to water and try and force him to drink. Done enough of that futile nonsense.