Posted on 02/04/2018 11:47:04 AM PST by ransomnote
Not if the copter was sabotaged.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/42+Egret+Ct,+Newport+Beach,+CA+92660/@33.6536114,-117.8726685,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x80dcde4ef46760f3:0xe92f5d6de04cfaf9!8m2!3d33.653607!4d-117.8704798
It's about 500 feet from a somewhat open area, astride the beach.
The location is reasonable for a pilot trying to make an emergency landing.
Its because most links on 8chan have spaces in them so that the link can’t be clicked on directly. You have to take the spaces out.
http:// www.latimes
Do you notice the space between // and WWW.
Sometimes they have multiple extra spaces that need to be taken out.
A scratch on a prop blade commonly causes a chopper crash..?
That’s quite a stretch.
I agree with the rest of what you wrote, though.
Too many Jesus nuts on a helicopter.
Can you please explain ‘spirit cooking’?
The crash was next to the intersections of Cormorant Circle and Pelican Court.
So, short of the clearing astride the bushy coastal area.
So it would have to be either a legit emergency or sabotage.
The place doesn't really suggest suicide.
I am not a floppper pilot and know little about them, but:
Any prop under load flexes. Any pilot who does not have a death wish will check his prop or props very carefully before every flight unless he has operated only on clean surfaces free of gravel.
Even then, the first flight of every day demands an inspection.
Reason being that when the prop flexes under load, an excessive amount of flex will go to the scratched or nicked point, causing the prop to flex excessively at that point. Catastrophic failure will occur within a given amount of flight time according to depth of length of damage.
There are many stories of light twins and single engine aircraft that had the engines jerked off the mounts.
I have been retired for 20 years but I have personally seen two engines jerked off the engine mounts.
I have been told that floppers are even more sensitive to this problem, but I say again I have no personal experience with them. I swore that I would never ever ride in one and so far I have made good on that.
This line from the Q post paints a picture that’s potentially extremely big.
“How ‘they’ control those they need.”
Assume this was a house, a home. Were any inside the home killed? Who owned the house and who was in the house?
Sorry, for the questionable interruption.
The pedophilia and related monstrous crimes are how they control others. With blackmail, etc.
If this becomes known to the public, it’s goodbye deep state forever.
This system of control used by the deep state is one of those 40,000 foot views Q has spoken of.
You are right about that.
I could have mentioned those little tiny things that hold that big machine to the blades.
A loose nut...a “lost” safety wire....
Somebody needs to figure out a way to get AS talking.
That made no sense to me until I saw the post describing the “art” in that hotel.
This might really be big.
Lolita Express...
Isn’t that guy named Erickson?
I suspect that when he read this news report he sleeps with his eyes open.
He had better.
And no pillows in the bedroom.
There is one specific chemical that makes a person’s eyes do the Adam Schiff thing: adrenaline.
Acute fear is one cause of adrenaline release. Another would be substances like cocaine and amphetamine.
Seems very likely adrenochrome would do it.
No one in any of the homes was killed or injured.
One neighborhood pedestrian sustained minor injuries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.