Posted on 02/07/2018 12:48:49 PM PST by RedMonqey
The SI staff wanted the issue’s models to act as participants in response to the #MeToo era, instead of objects. The issue will include models like Paulina Porizkova, Sailor Brinkley-Cook, and Robyn Lawley, all rocking inspiring attire (or words, when they are sans clothes).
I guess you’re supposed to look but not look, or something . . .
Because the SI swimsuit issue is all about displaying a woman’s intellect.
They really are the weaker sex if they expect everyone else to live by their double standards.
Did they dress all the models in Burkini’s?
Now if that doesn’t blow the heads offa NOW Gals, then what will LOL
... because you can’t spell “embrace” without “bra”....
That’s hilarious. Yep, I looked at the words, not the body.
All I can do is shake my head.
SI is dying as fast as ESPN
They just can’t keep politics out of sports.
Dumb idiots.
SI is dying as fast as ESPN
They just can’t keep politics out of sports.
Dumb idiots.
What sport is this again? At least you could kinda say the swimsuit issue is sorta about swimming. Which can be a sport.
I thought it was about Sports...(and swimsuits)
:-)
"What are you so aggravated about?"
"I spent over an hour putting on all of my make-up, coordinating
my pants and blouse and doing my hair. And l had barely got out
the front door when some strange guy harassed me!"
"Wow. What did he do?"
"He noticed!"
More controversy over Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue. Has gone on for decades.
I remember as a young man, enjoying it. I just thought it was fun, to dream of the girls and sandy beaches, when that issue came out in the dead of winter. I thought the feminist types too it way too seriously.
So they want to be “relevant” with the MeToo movement? Go for it, I guess.
I don’t get the liberal/feminista mind. We men can both enjoy and appreciate and be “turned on” by the beauty of a woman, and still treat women, professional women, as equals in the workplace and the boardroom. One does not exclude the other. We men can look to the attractiveness of a woman, and not be motivated to go rape her or harrass her.
There seems to be the notion that despicable male behavior is done by and approved of by the masses of men. That too is a grave error on the part of the feminista agenda here.
And how do the feminista types explain, that from Harvey Weinstein on down, the majority of the men involved have been liberals/Democrats?????? Their own politically liberal men by and large, are the ones who prey on women in the despicable manners we have heard about.
All my thoughts were dirty... was I suppose to read it, too?
Because the SI swimsuit issue is all about displaying a woman’s intellect.Exhibit A
Post sucks, no pictures.
What’s that above your post , chopped liver
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.