To: ProgressingAmerica
Unless I hear a good, simple explanation here, then it’s the same as we always thought:
Progressivism = Communism.
12 posted on
02/08/2018 8:04:25 PM PST by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
To: ProgressingAmerica
All you have to do is have a conversation with a “progressive” and then have one with a “communist.”
They talk, act and think exactly the same. And their mind is always a couple notches lower than the brightest non-progressivecommunist.
13 posted on
02/08/2018 8:08:26 PM PST by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
To: reasonisfaith
Problem is, it isn't simple. An ideology such as progressivism, which morphs at least three times by definition cannot be simple.
However, I can make it quite simple in the following regard:
America's first progressive president appeared in 1900. That is not the same year America's first communist president appeared.
14 posted on
02/08/2018 8:12:20 PM PST by
ProgressingAmerica
(We cannot leave history to "the historians" anymore.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson