Q could be fake and get everything right. Q could be fake and get much or all of it wrong. Q could be real and still get things wrong. Q could be real and get most things right.
It's OK to say "I don't know, thus far he has attributes of real and attributes of fake and attributes of in between.'
Guess what! It's also OK if someone else suspects something different from you. (Royal you.) Me, I don't know. Attributes of fake and attributes of real. Attributes of also maybe knowing some things but not others.
In addition to hating 'not knowing', and needing to be right, was it not Trump himself who pointed out that he sells by playing to people's hopes and imagination? At this point I would say the humble thing to declare is 'I don't know.' Whether he's fake or real or in between, I suspect some or much of his story resembles reality.
Many who insult the non-believers here would be an easy negotiating target for Trump because they see what they want to see. But many of the deniers are just negative nellies, like to put things down.
I could be fake and get much of everything wrong.
Would you devote hours of your day listening to me?