Q: “Chapters”, same week Assange posts Fire and Fury chapters with O’s replaced with Q’s.
Q: “CFR”: Next day, Assange makes two posts about CFR.
Q: “Apache” (Image of a Flag named Freedom” Next day Wikileaks posts “Apache = the sound of freedom”
Q: “John Perry Barlow” Next day Assange writes about “John Perry Barlow”
And you think it’s a coincidence? You believe that Assange had absolutely no knowledge of these Q posts before posting tweets?
I thought the realJulianAssange twitter account was a fake?
It looks like Assange is posting the day after Q posts. Why wouldn’t he have knowledge of the Q posts the day after they were posted?
“And you think it’s a coincidence?”
The are more alternatives than a): “coincidence” or b): “Q is confirmed!”
For example, these are also alternatives:
c): “Assange created ‘Q’ as a publicity vehicle, like a number of previous publicity stunts he has done in the past”
d): “Assange has nothing to do with ‘Q’, but just inserts phrases from Q posts into his tweets because he realizes Q followers will think he is connected to Q, and that will gain him more publicity”