Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Ray
There was no point in a Jagdtiger when they had Jagdpanther. I think the 88mm PAK was good enough to kill anything that appeared during the war, including the Pershing and IS tanks.

Ther was no point in any of their heavy tanks including Panther which by allied standards was a heavy tank.

Yes the Tiger may have been invulnerable from the front but when you never have more than 30-40 operational Tigers along a +1,000 miles front, they become useless... even resource liabilities in the larger scheme of the conflict.

7 posted on 04/07/2018 10:00:05 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: fso301

Dunno.
The Mark IV was getting a little long in the tooth and the Mark III was obsolete for anything but an assault gun chassis.
A simplified Panther and Jagdpanther might have been a good idea.
Problem was, the Panther the Germans built was larded up (which started out as a German T-34...) with gizmos inleaved road wheels and they couldn’t build them fast enough.
Tigers, though, were a waste of production lines and steel.


20 posted on 04/07/2018 10:43:36 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson