Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Huskrrrr

I have read that they would have been better off if they hit it head-on....It would seem to me that with all of the inherent weaknesses of the boat, had they hit the iceberg head-on, it probably would have sunk faster than it did.


14 posted on 04/15/2018 8:49:39 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Ouderkirk

Yes, I heard that as well. Also, had they not reversed the propellers, which affects the ship’s ability to steer, they might have been able to steer around the iceberg.


27 posted on 04/15/2018 10:04:26 AM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

By ripping the side open, it made the bulkheads worthless. A head on strike would have crippled the ship...she would have stayed afloat.


45 posted on 04/15/2018 1:02:37 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Ouderkirk

Ships even then are built with a collision bulkhead near to the fore peak. The void space between the stem and the collision bulkhead was meant to absorb the energy of an allision/ collision and maintain the watertight boundary.

The allision with the berg raked down the side of the ship simultaneously opening several compartments to the sea. So much buoyancy lost pulled the ship down, with water overtopping the compartment bulkheads progressively flooding more compartments, the ship’s fate was sealed.


46 posted on 04/15/2018 1:58:13 PM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson