So - he isn’t a citizen being singled out and persecuted for being inconvenient to a totalitarian state?
> “ ... but Robinson isn’t the man to represent conservatives or anyone on this issue.”
WHY?
Sorry but Mr Intolerance has me blocked
I read it.
This isn’t about Robinson.
It’s about due process.
Or, in this case, the lack of it.
I could care about the likeability of the perp.
Yeah, OK...
As soon as I hit the usage of the terms ‘fascist’ and ‘storm-tropper’...
...Stopped reading right there.
Yet another biased sharticle.
I often cannot help but wonder if people who claim “tolerance” is such a virtue ever spend even a brief moment examining just what it is they are tolerating.
Tommy is a fighter.
A bit like Trump in that regard.
The twitter feed does everything it can to put him in the worst light possible, much as the media in the U.S. is doing to President Trump.
I think the actions of the dhimmi cuck British leadership is reprehensible. I think the grooming gangs...skinning alive is too good for them. Allie with someone who is a known element who may be just a little nuts? I think I'd want to known this before I enter into a debate over the matter.
If you don't care, I understand and it's cool.
Sorry, Saul - real men fight, while the fruity sorts write caustic articles.
This fight isn't about conservativism, that term has lost all significance over the years. Rather it's a fight over nationalism, sovereignty and the preservation of Western culture. In that regard Tommy Robinson is a leader while Saul Montes-Bradley presents as an unknown academic.
Half of the people on FR are bullies too - but that doesn’t make them any less my teammate and ally in the fight of right versus wrong.
I’ll back this Tommy guy even knowing his background. Of the BILLIONS of people affected by the army of Islam he is one of the very few willing to stand up and fight. And for that, I will have his back.
Adam Kokesh is a jerk too. A real treasure for our enemies when they refer to his drug habit, his Jonesian lifestyle and the rest. But still, he confronts our own government and calls them out on their sh!t and for that I’ll defend him.
Speaking of Jonesian lifestyle... Alex Jones. He too has spots in his past. But still I defend this guy to the ends of the world.
Somehow I doubt that a Jeb Bush type would be able to put up the needed fight - just hard to imagine.
Saul Montes-Bradley-—Don’t care for this guy.
Douglas Murray provides the counterpoint to Saul Montes-Bradley in a June 2017 video
Robinson is the nail that must be hammered down because the Establishment must not allow his message to be aired publicly. He must be destroyed in much the same way that dissidents were sent into mental institutions in the Soviet Union.
Robinson is not the problem. The Establishment that ignores the will of the people is the problem. He is stating an inconvenient truth that resonates with the people. He is being silenced and demonized. An imperfect messenger, perhaps. But the means used to silence him should scare us all.
Irrelevant. He was jailed for observing something.
After that mis-characterization, this fools words fall on deaf ears.
Pastor Niemoller in Germany made the point about “first they came for” regarding Germany in the 1930’s.
When Dr. Csrl McIntire “Freedom is everybody’s business” in my tagline here on FR lost his radio station to Fairness Doctrine sanction in the 1970’s, he broadcast for a time from offshore as a ‘pirate radio station’.
McIntire, who advocated a total military victory in Vietnam costing him the radio station invited Jane Fonda to join him at the microphone, not to endorse “Hanoi Jane” but to endorse freedom of speech for all sides of the debate in the USA.
Tommy Robinson’s freedom is everyone’s freedom right now, no kidding.
Trump was labeled as a man who should not represent principled conservatives.
Well, I now say “piss on principled conservatism, the man FIGHTS!”
He's outstanding! Intelligent,articulate and fearless!
A few months ago he weighed in on the subject of free speech in Britain...it's worth a listen.
What about the history and background of Saul Montes-Bradley? Do the two last names give him some kind of gravitas I should acknowledge?