Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama
How can a corporation be guilty of a sexual act ?

Wasn't there something in Harvey's contract that specified that Disney would pay settlement costs for women who complained about him assaulting them?

In other words, the company knew and built the legal costs of his assaults into the budget.

Am I wrong on this?

16 posted on 06/02/2018 10:09:42 AM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Lizavetta

If that is true then yes they would be liable IMO.
You just answered my question


22 posted on 06/02/2018 10:29:36 AM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Lizavetta

thenewyorker.com
Ronan Farrow

Weinstein used nondisclosure agreements to evade accountability for claims of sexual harassment and assault for at least twenty years. He used these kinds of agreements with employees, business partners, and women who made allegations—women who were often much younger and far less powerful than Weinstein, and who signed under pressure from attorneys on both sides.

Weinstein also hid the payments underwriting some of these settlements. In one case, in the nineteen-nineties, Bob Weinstein, who co-founded the film studio Miramax with his brother, paid two hundred and fifty thousand pounds, roughly six hundred thousand dollars today, to be split between two female employees in England who accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual harassment and assault. The funds came from Bob Weinstein’s personal bank account—a move that helped conceal the payment from executives at Miramax and its parent company, Disney, as well as from Harvey Weinstein’s spouse.

In an interview, Bob Weinstein acknowledged the personal payout but said that his brother had misled him about the reasons behind it. “Regarding that payment, I only know what Harvey told me, and basically what he said was he was fooling around with two women and they were asking for money,” Bob Weinstein told me. “And he didn’t want his wife to find out, so he asked me if I could write a check, and so I did, but there was nothing to indicate any kind of sexual harassment.” A former senior Miramax executive said that it was implausible that Bob Weinstein did not know about the nature of the allegations, which were reported to the company.

It has become common practice to use nondisclosure agreements to resolve allegations of sexual misconduct. Some legal experts, including the victim’s-rights attorney Gloria Allred, who is representing some of Weinstein’s accusers, stress that victims may actually prefer such agreements. Allred told me that her firm had represented “thousands” of people who have entered into confidential settlements and said, “some people don’t want their parents, their friends, members of their community to know.”


34 posted on 06/02/2018 5:02:09 PM PDT by Liz ((Our side has 8 trillion bullets;the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson