Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ignoring the Samantha Power bombshell
The American Thinker ^ | June 06, 2018 | Jay Latimer

Posted on 06/07/2018 7:21:11 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Frankly, your air of moral superiority bla bla

You admitted you're part of the conga-line of people who on the hour declare nothing is going happen, no one gets fired, no indictments, no prosecutions...Everyone walks, nothing, zip? Then suddenly you start defining what needs to happen after Trump has already shaken D.C. to it's core all in less than 1.5 years? Boy, maybe you should have ran for president.

And this coming from a person who readily admits habitually expressing negative or pessimistic views, then gets PO'd when someone calls them on it?

Get real.

21 posted on 06/07/2018 11:53:12 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Seems like the Community Organizer, noble warrior that he's not, laid a trap so his underlings Powers and Rice will take the fall.  But if I know Trump, he's gonna to go after Barkie.  Watch out Barkie!  Be afraid, be very afraid.


22 posted on 06/08/2018 12:51:02 AM PDT by poconopundit (MAGA... Get the Spirit. Grow your community. Focus on your Life's Work. Empower the Young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
Ok, let's do the careful reading test.

My post:

IMO, at the absolute maximum, any and all of HRC and all the FBI/CIA guys will be convicted of making false statements... Which you misread as: ..people who on the hour declare nothing is going happen, no one gets fired, no indictments, no prosecutions.

See, but I said "will be convicted of..." and in case it isn't clear or is beyond as "real" as you comprehend or suggest that I get, there has to be an indictment and a trial and a verdict (or, a plea) for this thing called "a conviction" so when I say there will be "[a] conviction(s)" and you claim that I say "there will be no convictions" when I have just said there could, might be convictions albeit on lesser charges, then I have to wonder if you read my post or are just interested in saying "conga-line" a few times because you like the way it sounds. I have to wonder if I am speaking to someone with either a low command of the English language or reading skills, or both. But it makes the notion of trying to discuss something and clarify what I said that you did not get when you read it to the extent that you are misstating it, twice, hardly worth it. Maybe you should practice your congas.

Back to my post:

No espionage violations for HRC. Oh, people will get fired.... To which you reply: ..people who on the hour declare nothing is going happen, no one gets fired, no indictments, no prosecutions. and some will lose their pensions.

But see, I *did* say "fired" so when you reply people who on the hour declare nothing is going happen, no one gets fired, no indictments, no prosecutions... I am once again in the same position. You are misquoting me and then accusing me of being something lesser than however you see yourself. Which I don't care about, but you're doing so on the basis of misquoting me and you'd have to be a flaming idiot to do that.

My post:

But if anyone thinks HRC will be sentenced to anything commensurate with her 30,000+ violations of the espionage act, color me skeptical. And she will never serve any time because she will be too ill. Any prison sentences for *any* of these characters will be measured in months, if at all.

Neither of us can predict the future. But HRC will not see the inside of jail cell, I don't care how many how many convictions she gets for violations of 18 USC 793, each of which carries a potential 10 year sentence. She will conveniently get very sick by the time she is convicted of anything worse than making false statements.

23 posted on 06/08/2018 12:58:17 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Why aren’t Conservative media screaming about this?

Because there are “no sides” in Washington. They are all part of the same racket.

It’s a hard pill to swallow when you realize the whole thing is corrupt.


24 posted on 06/08/2018 2:14:47 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Why would Brennan use Powers name when he could just use his own? And did on many occasions?

No. It had to be someone who either did not have standing to request unmaking or who did not want anyone to know he was doing it. Namely Obama.


25 posted on 06/08/2018 8:04:03 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
#5. Where’s the conga-line of people who on the hour declare nothing is going happen, no one gets fired, no indictments, no prosecutions...Everyone walks, nothing, zip?

#11 That would be me.

Your words, not mine. Then ya started ramping up your demands for Trump's success, again defining what success means according to *you*, as you start heehawing about, "Hillary will never be prosecuted for espionage" etc.

Fact is, you have no clue what's going to happen, so ya place the benchmark for success as high as it could possibly go. That's exactly what you're doing. Not clever, not slick.

People like your are fortunate to have Trump as president, because none of this epic corruption would have ever been revealed or exposed. Hillary Clinton would be your president if not for Trump. You don't deserve this president in my opinion.

Now get back to the sidelines and continue jumping form thread to thread chanting, "Nothing will happen, no one will be held responsible".

26 posted on 06/08/2018 10:05:16 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson