[hopespringseternal]

Still waiting for you to post anything that disproves what I said.

Millions of years of erosion and seismic activity would create massive differences in layer placement and thickness everywhere. Instead you see the opposite — layers are remarkably consistent in thickness and depth. Even your picture shows this.

[dirtboy]

i already explained it to you. You just don’t like the answer. And you failed to rationally explain the folding - rock softens from heat due to compreession. Expansion would not heat the rock to allow the folds to undo themselves.

[BroJoeK]

hopespringseternal: "Still waiting for you to post anything that disproves what I said.
Millions of years of erosion and seismic activity would create massive differences in layer placement and thickness everywhere.
Instead you see the opposite — layers are remarkably consistent in thickness and depth."

In what way does this example from the Grand Canyon support such claims?

[dirtboy]

Millions of years of erosion and seismic activity would create massive differences in layer placement and thickness everywhere. Instead you see the opposite — layers are remarkably consistent in thickness and depth. Even your picture shows this.

Ever hear of the Catskill Delta, deposited in the Devonian? Here is a cross sectino from central PA to Ohio:

Doesn't look like it is "remarkably consistent in thickness and depth" in the least.