Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Waiting to exascale: Now that IBM has Summit-ed, who's to node what comes next?
The Register ^ | 14 June 2018 | Chris Mellor

Posted on 06/14/2018 11:04:26 AM PDT by ShadowAce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: ShadowAce

China will clone it.


21 posted on 06/14/2018 1:44:50 PM PDT by kenmcg (tHE WHOLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

I understand that IBM owns a huge fraction of the patents for blockchain technology (BitCoin). They aren’t going anywhere but up for quite a while.


22 posted on 07/05/2018 5:55:28 PM PDT by AFPhys ((Liberalism is what Smart looks like to Stupid people - ® - Mia of KC. Rush - 1:50-8/21/15))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

“There’s a 40MW limit for power consumption and scaling up Summit power usage by 2.5x gets us to 32.5MW”

-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—

Wow. My recollection is that a the power plant of a nuclear submarine puts out approximately 40MW. Sheesh - this gadget sucks up a lot of juice!


23 posted on 07/05/2018 5:59:08 PM PDT by AFPhys ((Liberalism is what Smart looks like to Stupid people - &reg; - Mia of KC. Rush - 1:50-8/21/15))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

What kind of problems can be solved with a machine this fast?


24 posted on 07/05/2018 6:09:40 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
What kind of problems can be solved with a machine this fast?

Nuclear explosion modeling, weather modeling, gene sequencing.

Keep in mind there are/will be probably hundreds of users on this machine at the same time. That means that it is working on hundreds of different problems at the same time. They probably aren't quite as complicated as what I listed, but it all helps.

25 posted on 07/06/2018 2:20:56 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Thanks! Would you trust using a nuclear weapon that was modeled by a computer without testing the design in the real world?


26 posted on 07/06/2018 10:53:04 AM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
I am not in Nuclear engineering, so I have no way to answer that.

Given that, I would say that enough explosions have been monitored, and measurements taken, that the models are probably quite accurate. I also believe that real word testing is still occurring, so it's probably a combination of the two. Modeling gets you close, testing perfects it.

27 posted on 07/06/2018 11:06:43 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

We have done precisely that since we stopped doing underground testing a while back.


28 posted on 07/06/2018 11:17:11 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson