something her mother should have considered...
Posted on 07/11/2018 11:10:18 AM PDT by Morgana
British royal bride Meghan Markle waded into the abortion debate Tuesday, supposedly by saying she was “pleased” that Ireland voted to repeal its constitutional protections for unborn babies.
Markle and Prince Harry are visiting Ireland this week in their first official trip overseas as a married couple. The Irish Sun reports Markle allegedly expressed her support for abortion during a summer party with Irish political leaders and celebrities Tuesday at Glencairn.
“A pleasure to meet Prince Harry & the Duchess of Sussex at the British Ambassador’s Residence this evening,” Irish political leader Catherine Noone wrote on Twitter. “The Duchess & I had a chat about the recent referendum result. She watched with interest & was pleased to see the result.”
In May, Ireland voted to repeal its Eight Amendment, which protected unborn babies’ right to life. Now, politicians are considering radical pro-abortion legislation that would legalize abortion up to six months of pregnancy, force taxpayers to fund abortions and force religious hospitals to abort unborn babies.
Noone, a strong advocate of abortion on demand, later deleted the tweet after people raised concerns about British royal protocol.
The Irish Independent reports:
Some online critics claimed that the former Suits actress had breached royal protocol which prevents them from expressing political views.
Ms Noone denied this, she admitted that the tweet was ill-judged and promptly deleted it.
She told Independent.ie: “I deleted it because it was unintentionally misleading – the Duchess was not in any way political.”
But according to the Daily Beast, Markle allegedly expressed her support for abortion to others, too. Una Mullally, a pro-abortion political campaigner and journalist, implied that Markle also talked with her about supporting abortion during the party.
“Great to chat with Meghan Markle, Duchess Of Sussex, about Repeal and the importance of her feminist activism,” Mullally wrote. “So important to have people in her position championing women’s rights.”
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
Unlike Noone, Mullally did not delete her tweet.
Markle describes herself as a feminist, and the label often has been used as synonymous with support for abortion. However, many pro-life women have bucked back against this assumption by identifying as feminists and arguing that true feminists support rights for all women, born and unborn.
It is not safe to assume that someone supports abortion because they describe themselves as a feminist. But unfortunately in Markle’s case, it appears to be true.
Yeah, those things in your 2nd paragraph are what I was going to mention.
There’s more stuff...re Harry’s escapades, but I figured that what I wrote was enough. :-)
Not just better, but much better. Maybe he has real low self-esteem or he wanted to stick it to his family.
Ms Markle has her own sleazy history. The National Enquirer suggested she may have been married young and had that marriage annulled. No follow-up on that one. She then married on a beach in Jamaica. When she found out she was going to be on a CABLE TV SHOW, she sent her rings back to her husband by mail. He was shocked. Then she started working on Suits and met someone who knew Harry. Her plan to meet him and appear to be so much like him, started with her traveling to Africa on a ‘goodwill’ mission. He was lovestruck when he found that out! (Do we really think she would have made the trip unless there was something in it for her?) The whole ‘stars are aligned’ was charted without Harry’s knowledge and he fell into the honey trap. But as we’ve discussed, he wasn’t very bright to begin with. So, they probably are well ‘suited’ to each other, both self-absorbed narcissists. This train wreck will be interesting to say the least.
something her mother should have considered...
She was OBSESSED with the RF from an early age AND Di! Her family and friends have talked about how she wanted to be a princess.
Whilst still married to the producer, she had many affairs, in Canada, and was in a supposedly "SERIOUS" relationship with some "famous" Canadian chef, when she cooked up getting her hands on Harry with a friend/s. She planned this.
She got Harry at his lowest, most lonely, and kinda "lost" time. All of his pals and his brother were married or about to be, most already had kids, none of his old girl friends wanted him, her tried to hit on Pippa, who wanted NOTHING to do with that, so Harry was VERY EASY PICKINGS!
And from the beginning, she has ordered him around, which perhaps he likes...or just may grow weary of eventually. Who knows?
And then there is the fact that Harry just is NOT very intelligent at all and unstable, like his mother.
Well, hopefully not the Nazi Sympathizer part.
Not to be rude on your re-counting the sleazy history but there are one or two parts missing and important as to HOW she met Harry. It’s well known she finagled a membership to SOHO House/Club in Canada. It is how she met all her high flying friends , some of who attended her wedding.Its quite the place with private rooms for members. Its known she “met” (think gymnastics of a sexual kind) a friend of Harry who then passed her on to him. She also had a a reputation as a “yacht girl” and was known to Brett Ratner and Steve Mnuchin.
Princess Pushy she may be to some but there is only one real Princess Pushy and that is Princess Michael of Kent (in residence at KP) she’s the one and only from day One.
Markle? beyond pushy- she bagged her unwitting prey.
Old Harry got bamboozled. I give this train wreck of a marriage 5 years.
har•ri•dan (ˈhɑr ɪ dn) n. a scolding, vicious woman; hag; shrew.
[1690–1700; perhaps alter of French haridelle worn-out horse, gaunt woman]
Perhaps her knickname will be 'Harrydan'.
She must have gotten her hands on the Royal Lockbox.
Didn’t Jonathan Swift write a Modest Proposal about just such events?
Princess Michael of Kent REALLY IS PRINCESS PUSHY! And, in the end, Markle has never been a Princess, she is only Duchess via her marriage to Harry and she will lose her title if they divorce. I suspect she really wants to stay part of the Royal family so, if they tell her to shut her trap, she will.
And thanks for the missing info. Very interesting.
PS-Princess Michael of Kent could give Markle a run for her money in the Kensington Palace enclosure. They will either be the closest of friends (as they are so much alike) or the bitterest of enemies (as they are so much alike).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.