Well, Ben, you will need to clarify your question as to what I am sure about?
If you are asking about whether Obama's homo-existence is driven by his genitalia...I would say that you have hit the nail on the "head" (pun unavoidable).
If Obama is, as we hear and can clearly see, is a "homo-erectus" (a twentieth century man whose life is led by his "erection), then, yes...the correct category for this story about Obama is "genitalia/chat."
My tagger nails it