Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Politicians Aspiring High Office-Not Constitutionally Eligible Pres & CinC of Our Military or VP
CDR Kerchner (Ret) Blog ^ | 08 Sep 2018 | CDR Kerchner (Ret)

Posted on 09/08/2018 3:45:16 PM PDT by CDR Kerchner

Natural Born Citizen – A List of Politicians Aspiring to High National Office Who Are Not Constitutionally Eligible to be President and Commander-in-Chief of Our Military, or Vice President. They are Not a Natural Born Citizen.

The list: https://www.scribd.com/lists/22182725/Politicians-Who-Are-Not-A-Natural-Born-Citizen

As per ‘Principles of Natural Law‘ in place at the time of the founding of our country and when the founding documents including the U.S. Constitution were written, a ‘natural born Citizen’ is one born in the country to parents who are both Citizens (born Citizens or naturalized Citizens) of that country when their child is born in the country. See ‘The Three Legged Stool Test‘ for a graphic presentation of this constitutional requirement as to who can be President and Commander in Chief or our military. Click on the Euler Diagram shown below for a logic diagram presentation of this constitutional requirement.

(Excerpt) Read more at cdrkerchner.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: constitution; eligibility; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; potus; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: Mollypitcher1

Our first national immigration law was the Naturalization Act of 1790. That was not long after the Constitution was signed, and it mentioned the phrase, natural born.


61 posted on 09/09/2018 4:07:08 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Thomas Jefferson’s use of Vattel’s “The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law” to help write our founding documents: https://www.thepostemail.com/2010/05/03/jefferson-used-vattels-the-law-of-nations-to-write-our-founding-documents/
and http://pixelpatriot.blogspot.com/2015/09/vattel-is-law-part-1.html


62 posted on 09/09/2018 4:08:09 PM PDT by CDR Kerchner (natural born Citizen, natural law, Emer de Vattel, Supreme Court, presidential, eligibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

4 Supreme Court Cases define “natural born citizen”: https://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/

For those that would like to read online some of Vattel’s writings on kinds of citizenship see: https://lonang.com/library/reference/vattel-law-of-nations/vatt-119/


63 posted on 09/09/2018 4:16:36 PM PDT by CDR Kerchner (natural born Citizen, natural law, Emer de Vattel, Supreme Court, presidential, eligibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: familyop

So you’re saying that Hamilton, Madison, Adams and Jefferson, in writing our Constitution, cited Vattel’s composition about international treaties with that phrase? I very much disagree.
....................................................
You are in error. The letters, notes, records of the leaders of the country who composed the Constitution are explicit in their high regard of Vattel’s Law of Nations. Note that in the Constitution as I have cited, the Law of Nations is capitalized! Third grade English class should have taught you the meaning of Capitalization.
Furthermore Vattel’s three volume Law of Nations was NOT a work of “literature.” Vattel was the recognized international law expert at the time. To denigrate his monumental work in such a dismissive manner speaks poorly of your education.
ALL of the Framers from George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Hamilton, Mason on down studied Vattel’s work in both English and in the French in which it was originally written. Proof of this statement abounds. You have only to educate yourself. English Common Law was NOT the major factor in our legal structure by a long shot. English Law is based on servitude as the English citizen was a SUBJECT of the King who could change the laws on a whim. The entire American system of a Democratic REPUBLIC is based on the PEOPLE governing through those they choose to represent them. WE THE PEOPLE...........means what it says. America is NOT an offshoot of the Brits. We are UNIQUE!


64 posted on 09/09/2018 8:54:17 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: CDR Kerchner

Thank you for sharing your knowledge! It is a pleasure to find those who have truly studied the law and Vattel.


65 posted on 09/09/2018 8:58:06 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Go to 1795 to find that the error was corrected.


66 posted on 09/09/2018 8:59:32 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

Song: I Am America. “ ... I’ve got a feeling the tide is turning ... “ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0heL2Czeraw


67 posted on 09/09/2018 9:10:04 PM PDT by CDR Kerchner (natural born Citizen, natural law, Emer de Vattel, Supreme Court, presidential, eligibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1
"Go to 1795 to find that the error was corrected."

Yes, it looks that way.


68 posted on 09/10/2018 3:05:36 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: CDR Kerchner

Lets all hope the tide is turning. We MUST win in November. The future of a FREE America is in the balance. We are STILL fighting Communism but now it is embedded in our country and must be wiped out.


69 posted on 09/10/2018 9:34:05 AM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson