Posted on 09/17/2018 11:49:35 AM PDT by Regurgitated
Polygraphs are subjective. A person grades whether or not someone is lying.
No,do this, disregard the womans foggy and unverifiable recollections of anything, she is a lunatic
If she’s crazy, as has been suggested, she would likely pass (another) polograph, because she thinks it’s true.
And if they both pass, then what?
After weeks of bad press, accuser will testify in a public hearing televised on all networks and cable news channels.
The accuser will shed tears, recount the horrors that Kavanaugh put her through, with the Democrats on the committee tossing her softballs that she can hit out of the park. Republicans on the committee will refuse to play hard ball with her, out of fear of being labelled 'insensitive' and 'destructive' to the woman's feelings.
Kavanaugh will then testify that nothing happened, and the Democrats will regurgitate every syllable that Ford uttered, asking accusingly "are you calling HER a liar?"
After all of the drama, Kavanaugh will be voted out of committee along party lines, and confirmed on the Senate floor without a single Democratic vote. (All of this nonsense will have given the 3 or 4 Red State Democrat Senators up for re-election enough cover to not have to vote for him.)
It's Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill all over again.
Let’s do it the American way—waterboarding!
“She has already passed a polygraph test,...”
Are you sure? Source was CNN. What were the questions? Who conducted the test? How may times was it given to get the result they wanted? And on and on...
No lie detectors. Bring them both in under oath, Let the lady make her accusation. Let the nominee rebut. Ask questions. Have the vote right after.
She’d pass.
She’s a loon who came up with this “repressed memory” when she heard Mitt Romney might put Kavenaugh on the SCOTUS.
I don’t doubt for a moment that she’s not crazy enough to believe her tale.
Forget a 5 minute lapse, judge a man by his whole life!
Plan B - Life Review Wayback Machine, perhaps.
Ana Montes, absolutely guilty of spying, evidence was Bountiful in her apartment yet Ana passed every polygraph test given to her. How? There are some physical things that you can do which can alter your physiology just enough during questioning & will cause the polygraphed to have a false reading.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ana_Montes
Lots of proof like that which is why it’s inadmissible.
Really, all that can be accomplished in 5 minutes? Interdasting. Regale us all with your version of a Middle East peace plan, the five minute one.
Failure rate is well north of 5%. Think about that. Round up the usual suspects and voila, one is guilty.
This is not a legal setting; this is theater.
I would never submit to a polygraph!!!
Great. Love to see that Marine in action.
He scares me a bit. :)
That’s ridiculous
The f you want the polygraph to mean anything it is a lengthy and specific process which is not done in public
Swear em in. Ask the questions. If she won’t come and take an oath I ain’t interested. Actually either way I’m not interested. My Don’t Care gauge is over flowing
New Rules. We win. You Lose
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.